Re: [sc-users] 2D array question

[jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx]

On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 1:02 AM <brianlheim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I was bringing up the implementation to show that there is a simple and direct correspondence between the semantics in the language and the implementation in the interpreter. I'm sorry if that confused you.
>
> It's the other way around -- the implementation mirrors the semantics exposed to the programmer.

I do understand what you say, and it's both formally correct and
interesting. From a teaching perspective, though, I think it
introduces unnecessary confusion. Unfortunately I have two very full
days, with limited access to gmail, so I can't explain right now. I'll
follow up when I can.

hjh

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/