[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[sc-users] Re: Installing SC from source: Still recommend gcc 4.8?

To: sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sc-users] Re: Installing SC from source: Still recommend gcc 4.8?
From: stefaan.himpe@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 06:08:19 -0700 (MST)
In-reply-to: <CAEc4Ma39Axu+Ki9XVp7UfArngANNR3G2s_y-U8bYDQtw35zpHA@mail.gmail.com>
List-id: SuperCollider users mailing list <sc-users.create.ucsb.edu>
References: <CAEc4Ma2r6YKifuEVth0BTev+c621x35BU6YZZ0vDa09VQxK23A@mail.gmail.com> <CAEc4Ma39Axu+Ki9XVp7UfArngANNR3G2s_y-U8bYDQtw35zpHA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I'm not sure what is causing trouble for you, but I'm currently using gcc
(GCC) 7.2.1 20171128 without any obvious issues (on arch linux).





--
Sent from: http://new-supercollider-mailing-lists-forums-use-these.2681727.n2.nabble.com/SuperCollider-Users-New-Use-this-f2676391.html

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [sc-users] Re: Installing SC from source: Still recommend gcc 4.8?
  - From: jeffbrown . the

References:
- [sc-users] Installing SC from source: Still recommend gcc 4.8?
  - From: jeffbrown . the
- [sc-users] Re: Installing SC from source: Still recommend gcc 4.8?
  - From: jeffbrown . the

Prev by Date: [sc-users] Re: Installing SC from source: Still recommend gcc 4.8?
Next by Date: Re: [sc-users] Re: Installing SC from source: Still recommend gcc 4.8?
Previous by thread: [sc-users] Re: Installing SC from source: Still recommend gcc 4.8?
Next by thread: Re: [sc-users] Re: Installing SC from source: Still recommend gcc 4.8?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread