Re: [sc-users] top five sclang pet peeves

[i@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

> On 26 Dec 2017, at 02:22, <nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 2017-12-25 12:23, brianlheim@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> An obvious choice for namespace notation is :: (used in C++ and R, and
>> AFAICT not reserved in SC):
> 
> since methods start with lowercase letters, we have room in the grammar for Foo.Bar.

I like Foo::Bar. It looks similar to the long established Class:method representation.

For similar reasons could also be Foo:Bar, if we don’t want to make an extra distinction between class and library membership. (The capital shows this anyway I suppose)

S.
_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/