> >
Just because you don't use it yet, or wouldn't use it frequently, doesn't mean it deserves a long name.> Hmm. I’m sure it’s not personal, but I always feel that when people
start telling others how they work, or what their motivation is, that’s
kind of a sign that the discussion isn’t really in a productive place.
Scott, I'm sorry that my prior comments were not as impartial as they should have been.
On the other hand, through this discussion I've had to ignore comments like
> There’s way too many duplicate methods in SC added to support personal preference of developers.
> SC is already full of syntax variants which people added only because it was like their favourite language.
> Don’t think about how it feels to you, think about the effect it has on the language, users and general case.
Which are very obvious and unfair assumptions about my motivations. This puts me in the position of having to defend both my idea and my "virtue", which is perhaps why my frustration came out a bit in the last message.
-Brian