[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-users] Index.ar vs BufRd.ar




On 22 Dec 2017, at 20:34, <spluta@xxxxxxxxx> <spluta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Dec 22, 2017, at 11:07 AM, tremblap@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

The first one sounds cut (as if the index was just sampled at KR…) and the latter is fine (although I expect another interpolation somewhere as I have other example where it ‘polishes’ the reading). What I want is a sample per sample AR indexing of a buffer.

Until you prove it otherwise, BufRd with no interpolation is what you want. If you have another example where it smooths, we need to see it.

Sam

They are not equivalent. I’d need to check the UGen code, but I think Index assumes a wavetable…


{
l = LFSaw.ar(d.duration.reciprocal).range(0,d.sampleRate * d.duration);
[
Index.ar(d, l),
BufRd.ar(1, d, l, 0, 1)
]
}.plot