> Note that also python added .format after they had
> % for a long time (why? because % is less flexible:
This
comparison is not accurate. The notation is similar, but unlike Python,
SC `%` would have all the capability of .format. That is to say it (a)
wouldn't fail on attempting to format a collection type and (b) would
support all the types format does.
The problem of the variable name being far from the point of insertion is definitely valid though.
I
actually wasn't aware of f-strings until now actually, that seems like a
great feature and clever solution. Kind of like C++'s raw string
literals. (