good point. Careful benchmarking really might be necessary to decide this, see e.g. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/47903/udp-vs-tcp-how-much-faster-is-it > On 19.12.2016, at 22:15, Ogborn, David <ogbornd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > +1 ! > > Yours truly, > David > > ________________________________________ > From: owner-sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [owner-sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of amindfv@xxxxxxxxx [amindfv@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 5:10 PM > To: sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [sc-users] TCP default? > > File this under "not urgent": > > - Networks are much faster than they were when the decision was made to have a UDP default > > - Many OSC messages are in fact "better late than never": e.g. dropping a /n_free can be a lot worse than eg a moment of audio dropping out. UDP can drop out or reorder even on localhost(!) > > - Most SC development is done on localhost, where TCP is plenty fast. We assume you have to do more tinkering when you use a machine not on localhost; maybe that tinkering would include considering the switch to UDP? > > Any thoughts on switching at some point? (Or doing some exploratory benchmarking?) > > Tom > _______________________________________________ > sc-users mailing list > > info (subscription, etc.): http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx > archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/ > search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/ > > _______________________________________________ > sc-users mailing list > > info (subscription, etc.): http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx > archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/ > search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail