> On 18.12.2016, at 03:33, Tim Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> No, it doesn't. >> First, I should apologize for the heat of my reply. On a technical level, >> I'm quite sure I'm correct -- but the way I expressed it may not have been >> the most helpful. > > I apologize in turn for getting hasty and defensive about code I haven't touched since 2009. It might not even be my issue! (Yeah, right...) and, sorry about my comments about the classes being unreliable, probably they are fine! Or are there any things that you think would deserve some work?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail