[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-users] Quarks breaking sc




Don't misinterpret my brevity and "just-the-facts" responses as being frustrated or short tempered.

I am very busy and don't want to get wrapped up in long threads here. 

If somebody makes a false statement, then I have posted a correction.

I will say that I really don't like the overly emotional dramatization of suffering, complaints and "upset user".  
I find that very distracting, especially as it seems to be targeted at me (as though I were personally causing people to be upset,
as though this were my fault).

Let's stick to discussing the software and solutions to problems.



On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:23 AM Julian Rohrhuber <julian.rohrhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 14.12.2015, at 13:37, Chris Sattinger <crucialfelix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Recommend to remove the quark folder from Extensions. We could detect the path when using Quarks.gui and post a warning about potential conflicts.
>
> It can be documented in the release notes and the Upgrading from 3.6 notes.
>

just to finish with this: the quarks system is excellent, thanks again chris.
I’ll see if I can add the warning into the gui.
_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/