Re: [sc-users] Quarks breaking sc

[Daniel Mayer <daniel-mayer@xxxxxxxx>]

Am 13.12.2015 um 20:47 schrieb Julian Rohrhuber <julian.rohrhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> 
>> On 13.12.2015, at 20:15, Chris Sattinger <crucialfelix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Ah, that's something important to know.  If you report such issues then we can fix them.  Was it an issue that was reported and fixed recently ?
> 
> 
> I certainly mentioned it, either on github or sc-dev. It may have been fixed, there have been many changes afterwards. 
> 
> In the current context my point is only that it might be a good idea to keep a very simple way to extend sclang, the extensions folder seems not a bad one actually.



I agree, I don't see a reason to remove (or complicate) that easy way to extend SC.
If you're working with different versions of SC, this is not suppeorted by the Quarks system.
Probably there's no easy way to handle the version problem with extensions anyway,
but that's one more reason to keep the current conventions with the Extensions folder.

Greetings

Daniel

-----------------------------
www.daniel-mayer.at
-----------------------------




_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/