Re: [sc-users] Quarks breaking sc

[Julian Rohrhuber <julian.rohrhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> On 13.12.2015, at 15:16, James Harkins <jamshark70@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On December 13, 2015 9:56:27 PM Chris Sattinger <crucialfelix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Please don't spread FUD. The response for using the new Quarks has mostly
>> been that it has worked just fine.
> 
> I'm not sure if you're speaking to me or Alberto. I thought it was pretty clear that I'm not in favor of changes that break a user's configuration just from upgrading -- in other words, I'd prefer a situation where there is no FUD to spread.

completely fearlessly I can only say that on about 3 out of 10 cases with students new to sclang, the quarks couldn’t be made to work with the current master in October. I haven’t checked in the meantime, we just used the extensions folder.
_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/