[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-users] NanoKontrol.sc

To: sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [sc-users] NanoKontrol.sc
From: nescivi <nescivi@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:51:40 -0400
In-reply-to: <p06240805c6964940e145@[192.168.1.2]>
List-id: SuperCollider users mailing list <sc-users.create.ucsb.edu>
References: <4A6EDB7C.2000000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <D8A43E16-F26B-4F18-BB78-B5CF0AA3BBE1@xxxxxxxx> <p06240805c6964940e145@[192.168.1.2]>
Reply-to: sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.29-2-amd64; KDE/4.2.2; x86_64; ; )

On Wednesday 29 July 2009 14:49:43 Alberto de Campo wrote:
> hi,
>
> I've made a simple NanoKtl class, mainly for connecting to NodeProxies,
> but also general. I did not think of conforming to JInt, but could be worth
> converting and adding.

Oooh, these are really nice!

now, I'm really considering buying one :)

sincerely,
Marije

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [sc-users] NanoKontrol.sc
  - From: nescivi

References:
- [sc-users] NanoKontrol.sc
  - From: jesus gollonet
- Re: [sc-users] NanoKontrol.sc
  - From: LFSaw
- Re: [sc-users] NanoKontrol.sc
  - From: Alberto de Campo

Prev by Date: Re: [sc-users] s.meter on remote server (swingosc)?
Next by Date: Re: [sc-users] NanoKontrol.sc
Previous by thread: Re: [sc-users] NanoKontrol.sc
Next by thread: Re: [sc-users] NanoKontrol.sc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread