Re: [sc-users] how to tell when n_set messages have been executed

[Sciss <contact@xxxxxxxx>]

no, only those commands that "consume" some time are asynchronous,  
like all the buffer commands, d_recv, d_load etc. The  
Server_Command_Reference help file clearly shows that n_set, n_setn,  
like n_run, n_free, n_map etc. are synchronous commands, so they do  
not reply to the client.

that's why i think there is a bug somewhere.


Am 29.07.2009 um 19:56 schrieb lists@xxxxxxxxxxx:

> On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:23:23 +0200
> Sciss <contact@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > totally strange. even if you initially wait _two_ control blocks, the
> > reported value might still not have been updated:
>
> That's assuming that n_set is actually synchronous, which doesn't  
> seem to make sense as to be synchronous, the thread of language  
> execution would have to pause until the server somehow responds to  
> say the node has been updated. Well at least that's my understanding!
>
> cheers
>
> Matthew
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-users mailing list
>
> info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/ 
> sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
> search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/


_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/