[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[sc-users] [DSP] zero padding = interpolation ?
- To: sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [sc-users] [DSP] zero padding = interpolation ?
- From: Zlatko Baracskai <quattrophobia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:18:04 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=U/ka6Mm3xtTOh/T3H5/MbYWCtHqFD52SBxtZY3pyjyM=; b=m7KqpacNupRVl1umlDbeihuoQ8jRr9jJjd9sNXHtom7VxIBosnncZt0NyoxU6JeKcu 8yWi3f0REwkeC5lBFwMlu8QQY8iGlZBkZivPlCYZ6XLq/p6vTGxnuRmrg8bn4xphKbd8 K0ASuPGjZ4jx/f+1OcUQdK5Q0rSTuVF4BpFQk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=NOvY9+k53rwUbh8mLhUtk/ZqsoXVyR5TsJC5M/MhbDPJzI1GBOMAsAuqjJ0mnWu6r5 GZcH7Sjh6AocPXxV5q3Ca8JhNJ9rVF0kiD+r4oO8339AYX7nyy1eqiO6cGVZnVbEnDJb c6CRHpDRF2PB9AIsuBQV2/N6FFA+zatgQ23y4=
- List-id: SuperCollider users mailing list <sc-users.create.ucsb.edu>
- Reply-to: sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi All,
A quick debate here -
JOS states in one of his online bits that zeropadding a signal before FFT would obviously give you
a larger FFT size but that it will not contain significant spectral info as it is essentialy intrepolation of the magnitude values anyway.
This was in contrast to what my good old DSP teacher Peter Pabon taught me and yesterday I found a graph
describing zero padding in Udo Zolzers DAFX first chapter that clearly shows that the new magnitude points in
his example do give a better frequency resolution. It was also explicitly advised to increase frequency resolution
without compromising time resolution.
Anyone?
If someone has a zeropadding snippet, I'dd love to see it and try a few things,
can it be done with existing UGens anyway?
Cheers
Zlatko