Re: [sc-users] IdentityDictionary possible bug: does not behave correctly after a readArchive WAS Re: [sc-users] Parameter space - saving to disk

[Miguel Negrao <miguel.negrao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the heads up James. Where can you I check which types are 
atomic types ?

Nescivi, do you think it would be possible to have the ParameterSpace 
class use dictionaries instead of IdentityDictionaries ?



James Harkins escreveu:
> Not a bug. IdentityDictionaries should use only atomic types as keys.
> Point is not an atomic type. Therefore you should be using Dictionary
> instead.
> hjh
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Miguel Negrao
> <miguel.negrao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > With some investigations I concluded that IdentityDictionary's
> > cannot be loaded with a readArchive.
> >
> > z = Point(0.5,0.5)
> > y = Point(0.2,0.5)
> > a = IdentityDictionary.new;
> > a.put(z,"the point");
> > a.put(y,"another point")
> > a.writeArchive("/test")
> > b = Object.readArchive("/test")
> > b[b.keys.asArray[0]]
> >
> > this gives nil. This seems to me to be a bug, and I wonder if it could
> > be fixed (devs ?). MultiLevelIdentityDictionary suffers from the same
> > problem and that's what is keeping ParameterSpace from being saved
> > correctly.


--
Miguel Negrão // ZLB
http://www.friendlyvirus.org/artists/zlb/

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/