[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-users] [linux] Impulse question



On Wednesday 06 May 2009 20:13:02 Fredrik Olofsson wrote:
> hi,
> (this question is so common it should go into the faq.)
>
> the {}.play construction adds a short envelope and thereby takes out
> the initial impulse. use a synthdef or {Impulse.ar(1)}.play(fadeTime:
> 0) if you must.


add it to the Impulse helpfile?
as well as Function.play helpfile?


sincerely,
Marije


> _f
>
> 6 maj 2009 kl. 03.37 skrev Karsten Gebbert:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I found something strange which is at least to me quite
> > counterintuitive
> > and feels wrong:
> >
> > { Impulse.ar(1) }.play
> >
> > does not output the first impulse properly (or at all). Is this
> > intendet behaviour? Can others replicate that? I would expect the
> > behaviour to be that the first samples output by the ugen is the
> > impulse
> > so that:
> >
> > { Impulse.ar(0) }.play
> >
> > would output exactly one impulse and never progress any further. Am I
> > wrong in my assumptions or is this a possible bug? I think at least
> > that
> > even when supplying a very low value like 0.00001 to the freq argument
> > it should definitely output the first impulse no matter what, no?
> >
> > I use 3.3 on Debian/Lenny.
> >
> > Thanks to all,
> >
> > karsten
> >
> > --
> > -- http://krgn.goto10.org
>
> #|
> fredrikolofsson.com klippav.org musicalfieldsforever.com
>
> |#
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-users mailing list
>
> info (subscription, etc.):
> http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml archive:
> https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
> search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/