Re: [sc-users] SoundFile cue blocks sc

[blackrain <blackrain.sc@xxxxxxxxx>]

hey marije,

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:39 AM, nescivi <nescivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday 01 May 2009 06:55:11 blackrain wrote:
>> hi,
>> oh no, no - I think I was in a way side tracking.
>> my point was headed towards compatibility of releases and support packages.
>> which, in a way was part of the issue?
>
> I'm not sure what you're going at...

true, my replies never end up being that obvious =)

> On Linux, you compile against whatever libsndfile you have installed on your
> system, it has nothing to do with the libsndfile that is in the SC3 package.
> I don't know how Olaf got his regular lib, and the dev-package, out of sync in
> his Linux distro, but apparently it can happen in rare cases.
>

uh huh - exactly the point of my reply.
I still miss the times when ./configure used to build a tiny test bin
and really prove for a lib capabilities.

what I mean is - as long an install can get compromised, say /usr (a
distro pack) and /usr/local (most prolly user doings) point to difft
packages, scons (via its build script) has no way to tell which one it
will be using and linking to (unless we really do a test) - which lib
will sclang/scsynth be using.

say, it will link with a pack and be launched and really use a difft one.
/etc/libconfig and the like do play tricks, you know the order there
is relevant.


cheers,

x


> sincerely,
> Marije
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-users mailing list
>
> info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
> search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
>

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/