[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-users] Request for SC 3.4 - a better NRT interface

To: sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [sc-users] Request for SC 3.4 - a better NRT interface
From: Eric Lyon <audiodidact@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 14:42:58 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hENU1hM0qdS/X9gRqptqjbYKJ/haYOaWW8lZiqhw1x8=; b=hr0hfkhkZNj0gQbb6nSYT2jmMBMZyfIjarSJFnl//w41yyZW9u+PrxdCHTTFrtesRc gAgdQSY8JLvtRcSfNSuKX2OPgkEi3dpWC/CJyLdTUpg+1fkyzpDoTPMfW2dxGXZXUQgw ia5AsEOMMF7JA2POGWTDWH3e+CQokjcXrwIQE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=kDZ/LJNP+lErHOKIkOstcYlNkALeWXE3tzIJ6UBm6vuQUMuugLzcXrLHbp51VvT2NQ AO6J68URq+lu8iKgZCz9B2v6ycKhXNXRUklUAUPS7MsT+q0DNQR2ePnhsHdi8Xb02tYY ch6u49PosHF4+QEu57OBLtMh+HwBuwMeDaWgE=
In-reply-to: <1eb291c60905030620r5dcc733fvf3b97c995f5a5da5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-id: SuperCollider users mailing list <sc-users.create.ucsb.edu>
References: <4fc349ba0905022354g37217eb4se9a8da4cb43a20d8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <F2F8D1F3-B6BC-4BCB-892A-A9530182ACDC@xxxxxxxxxxx> <A2F15B8E-0D83-4BBE-A816-F44387875855@xxxxxxxxxx> <4fc349ba0905030300t56f0f66co95f4a63d921abc4e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7206C0AC-1D43-4199-8BE9-863F9C3F0434@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1eb291c60905030620r5dcc733fvf3b97c995f5a5da5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks, Scott.

I didn't know about that, but I guess it would only work if you used patterns. I'm hoping for something more general.

That all being said, I would support attempts to find a way to streamline NRT more, although by SC 3.4 I'll probably have a faster computer and have no need for NRT :P

One always believes that, and it never turns out to be true :^)

Eric

References:
- [sc-users] Request for SC 3.4 - a better NRT interface
  - From: Eric Lyon
- Re: [sc-users] Request for SC 3.4 - a better NRT interface
  - From: Andrea Valle
- Re: [sc-users] Request for SC 3.4 - a better NRT interface
  - From: Scott Wilson
- Re: [sc-users] Request for SC 3.4 - a better NRT interface
  - From: Eric Lyon
- Re: [sc-users] Request for SC 3.4 - a better NRT interface
  - From: Andrea Valle
- Re: [sc-users] Request for SC 3.4 - a better NRT interface
  - From: Scott Worthington

Prev by Date: Re: [sc-users] Request for SC 3.4 - a better NRT interface
Next by Date: Re: [sc-users] Help me map a control rate signal with a buffer
Previous by thread: Re: [sc-users] Request for SC 3.4 - a better NRT interface
Next by thread: Re: [sc-users] Request for SC 3.4 - a better NRT interface
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread