[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-users] transposing after time stretching, granular?


I also tried TPV and SMS, but they don't sound that great either actually. Plus they reach 30% CPU, so...
 
Would be nice to keep it all in the frequency domain though. I guess the thing you want is just to read a bigger or smaller chuck of audio per frame from the buffer holding the soundfile, or something like that right? I'm not looking for formant preservation in this case.
 
Any more thoughts?
 
 
From: josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [sc-users] transposing after time stretching, granular?
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 13:25:19 -0700

You can try PV_BinShift, but I have never found the results there to be that good. Otherwise, yes - PitchShift is a granular option. FreqShift is another.

Best,

Josh

On May 1, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Michael Dzjaparidze wrote:

Hello all,
 
Am I right if I say that if I want to transpose a sound after I have time stretched it with PV_BinBufRd I have to do it with something like PitchShift? Are there any other possibilities? Obviously I want to keep the same stretch time so something granular is probably the only option?
 
Thanks in advance,
 
Michael

Heb jij de nieuwe Messenger nog niet?! Download 'm hier

******************************************
/* Joshua D. Parmenter
http://www.realizedsound.net/josh/


“Every composer – at all times and in all cases – gives his own interpretation of how modern society is structured: whether actively or passively, consciously or unconsciously, he makes choices in this regard. He may be conservative or he may subject himself to continual renewal; or he may strive for a revolutionary, historical or social palingenesis." - Luigi Nono
*/


Haal meer uit je Hotmail met Internet Explorer 8. Download nu