Re: Re: [sc-users] Compiled language similar to sc ?

["Sc iss" <contact@xxxxxxxx>]

well it is really in alpha state, and also as you can see on the top SVN directory level, a collection of fragments that will eventually go together. for the case of the "sclip" branch, all you can do in this very moment is launch an eclipse application that has a server configuration view where you can boot scsynth, and a test view that plays a glissando. the replacement for sclang Routine is still unfinished (the logical time advancing in the scheduler is missing).

ciao, -sciss-


----- original message --------

Subject: Re: [sc-users] Compiled language similar to sc ?
Sent: Sun, 08 Mar 2009
From: sh0099<sh0099@xxxxxx>

> is in your projekt already something somebody could execute?
> what would i need?
> thanks
> olaf
> 
> 
> Sc iss schrieb:
> > i'm spending some time with scala these days ( www.scala-lang.org ), it is
> statically typed but has good type inference so you don't have to type so
> much as for example in java. it is also functional so you can do most of
> what sclang can do, with the addition of types that saves you a lot of
> trouble when developing more complex classes. of course, it might be not for
> you if you want a quickly responding live coding system, but i'm trying to
> figure out how close you can get. it's also not the perfect language but
> well, i guess there is no perfect language, as everyone has there personal
> preferences, and supercollider has a lot of syntactic sugar that makes the
> source code more compact. it misses things like default argument values and
> method calls with argument names (EnvGen.ar( Env.perc ), doneAction: 2), but
> some are on the way for scala 2.8 i think.
> >
> > some of my experiments can be found here
> http://tintantmare.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/tintantmare/sclip/
> >
> > cheers, -sciss-
> >
> > ----- original message --------
> >
> > Subject: Re: [sc-users] Compiled language similar to sc ?
> > Sent: Sat, 07 Mar 2009
> > From: Andrea Valle
> >
> > You may take a look at Smalltalk or Ruby
> > Best
> > -a-
> > On 7 Mar 2009, at 16:03, Miguel Negrao wrote:
> > Hi
> > Since I started using supercollider I'm become used to it's ease of use,
> and it's great functionality. When going back to c or c++ for other projects
> I always feel like going back to the stone age. I particularly love the
> flexible type system, I don't know the technical name of this, but being
> able to assign whatever I want to a variable without first defining what is
> easy. I love that everything is an object, and that the control structures
> are themselves methods of objects. In my code nowadays I don't ever use
> "for" loops, I always use .collect or .do . . I love the huge ammount of
> container classes with methods to do almost everything I can think off. Also
> the garbage collection is great.  So my question is, is there a compiled
> language that has this features ? And if yes, why the hell isn't everyone
> using it ?
> > cheers,-- Miguel Negrão // ZLBhttp://www.friendlyvirus.org/artists/zlb/
> > _______________________________________________sc-users mailing list
> > info (subscription, etc.):
> http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtmlarchive:
> https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/search:
> https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/ 
> >  --------------------------------------------------Andrea
> Valle--------------------------------------------------CIRMA -
> DAMSUniversità degli Studi di Torino--> http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/-->
> http://www.myspace.com/andreavalle-->
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/vanderaalle/--> 
> http://www.youtube.com/user/vanderaalle-->
> andrea.valle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx	
> > "The objectives of SuperCollider have been taken a stage further with the
> development of SAOL, the fruits of a research project based at MIT, launched
> in 1998" (P. Manning, Electronic and Computer Music, revised and expanded
> edition, 2004) 
> >
> >
> > --- original message end ----
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sc-users mailing list
> >
> > info (subscription, etc.):
> http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> > archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
> > search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sc-users mailing list
> 
> info (subscription, etc.):
> http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
> search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
> 

--- original message end ----


_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/