[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-users] Compiled language similar to sc ?



But it's interpreted, right ? One wouldn't be able to write a program like supercollider in it ?

Miguel

Vytautas Jancauskas escreveu:
Ruby is compiled to byte-code and is very similar. The technical name you
are referring to is "dynamic typing"

On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Miguel Negrao <
miguel.negrao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi

Since I started using supercollider I'm become used to it's ease of use,
and it's great functionality. When going back to c or c++ for other projects
I always feel like going back to the stone age.
 I particularly love the flexible type system, I don't know the technical
name of this, but being able to assign whatever I want to a variable without
first defining what is easy. I love that everything is an object, and that
the control structures are themselves methods of objects. In my code
nowadays I don't ever use "for" loops, I always use .collect or .do . . I
love the huge ammount of container classes with methods to do almost
everything I can think off. Also the garbage collection is great.
 So my question is, is there a compiled language that has this features ?
And if yes, why the hell isn't everyone using it ?

cheers,
--
Miguel Negrão // ZLB
http://www.friendlyvirus.org/artists/zlb/

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.):
http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/




--
Miguel Negrão // ZLB
http://www.friendlyvirus.org/artists/zlb/

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/