Re: [sc-users] Re: will there ever be real multiprocessor support?

[James Harkins <jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Dan Stowell <danstowell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I had missed this suggestion. It's a very interesting suggestion,
> essentially it would be the same approach as Max currently uses,
> allowing the user to explicitly define a parallelisable subgraph.
> Would one be able to add serial-groups inside a parallel-group? Hope
> so.

Yes, that would be necessary.

And...

> 2009/3/6 James Harkins <jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> So if you wanted to
>> distribute several source --> effect chains among different threads, you
>> would have a "parallel group" containing a number of "serial groups."

:)

hjh


-- 
James Harkins /// dewdrop world
jamshark70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.dewdrop-world.net

"Come said the Muse,
Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/