On Mar 5, 2009, at 3:28 PM, James Harkins wrote:
It's a hard new feature either way, so my view is, if it's going to take a lot of time, let's put in the time to do it properly on the first go and have something more user friendly than multiple servers.
Perhaps a MasterServer that can control multiple servers? Though yes - this issue just get mucky... Which goes back to my original point - I think a major re-thinking of architecture would be needed, and therefore a major re-write of code.
Sounds like SuperCollider 4 to me. Josh ****************************************** /* Joshua D. Parmenter http://www.realizedsound.net/josh/“Every composer – at all times and in all cases – gives his own interpretation of how modern society is structured: whether actively or passively, consciously or unconsciously, he makes choices in this regard. He may be conservative or he may subject himself to continual renewal; or he may strive for a revolutionary, historical or social palingenesis." - Luigi Nono
*/ _______________________________________________ sc-users mailing list info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/ search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/