Re: [sc-users] nodeproxy and re-evaluation

[LFSaw <lfsaw@xxxxxxxx>]

ok. great. hmgrmbl.
*g*

but: just write this:

~basse = TaskProxy({ loop { ~bass.send; (1+0.5.rand).wait; }})

// stop
~basse.free

// restart
~basse.play

this way you keep writing ProxySpace style…

(is this correct, julian? seems like there is no other possibility to  
restart the task again other then call play on the TaskProxy…)

lg
	Till



On 03.03.2009, at 00:14, Sylvain wrote:

> Great ! (and sorry Till ;) ) that's exactly what I wanted, ot more  
> exactly that :
>
> (Tdef(\basse,{ loop { ~bass.send; (1+0.5.rand).wait; }}).play;)
>
> Best, enjoy
>
> S.
>
> Julian Rohrhuber a écrit :
> > sorry, forgot to mention, in order for it to continue, you want to  
> > loop the task:
> >
> > (Tdef(\basse,{ loop { ~bass.send; 2.wait; }}).play;)
> >
> >
> > > Hi Julian,
> > >
> > > Ok, but it only happen once, then going back to its  
> > > "regularity" (i.e. without any beating)
> > >
> > > S.
> > >
> > > Julian Rohrhuber a écrit :
> > > > Hi Sylvain,
> > > >
> > > > you don't need to rebuild the proxy, sending is enough:
> > > >
> > > > (Tdef(\basse,{~bass.send; 1.wait;}).play;)
> > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's a feature/problem I come across quite often, which is  
> > > > > that when (in Jitlib) I evaluate a node proxy while it is  
> > > > > already running, I have some fading effects that I like. But  
> > > > > then, if I try to automate them, I don't have the effect anymore.
> > > > > To make it more clear, here's an example :
> > > > >
> > > > > (
> > > > > p=ProxySpace.push(s.boot);
> > > > > )
> > > > >
> > > > > ~bass.ar(2);
> > > > > ~bass.play;
> > > > > ~bass.fadeTime=2;
> > > > >
> > > > > ~ 
> > > > > bass 
> > > > > = 
> > > > > {Decay 
> > > > > .ar(Impulse.ar(5+LFNoise1.ar(0.1,0,0.2)))*SinOsc.ar([142,145], 
> > > > > 0,0.5)}
> > > > >
> > > > > If you evaluate this bunch of lines, you'll hopefully get some  
> > > > > sound, ok.
> > > > > Then evaluate again the last line and you will get beating  
> > > > > (coming from what I suppose to be the difference between the  
> > > > > freq and the time when you evaluate the line)
> > > > >
> > > > > But then if I would like to automate this "beating" effect, how  
> > > > > would I do ?
> > > > > I tried something like this, but doesn't help (unless first  
> > > > > time ...)
> > > > >
> > > > > (Tdef(\basse,{~bass.rebuild; 1.wait;}).play;)
> > > > >
> > > > > Any hints are welcome
> > > > >
> > > > > Best
> > > > >
> > > > > Sylvain
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > sc-users mailing list
> > > > >
> > > > > info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> > > > > archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
> > > > > search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > sc-users mailing list
> > >
> > > info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> > > archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
> > > search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-users mailing list
>
> info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
> search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/


_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/