it'd be a nice gesture by the person harvesting synthdefs to add, if possible, something about where it originally came from and/or credit the author. _f
2 mar 2009 kl. 18.22 skrev Click Nilson: Hi Rodrigo, This sounds like a great project, I'm all for lots of tag metadata for searching too... You should harvest from the many pieces and fragments posted to the sc-users mailing list(s) over the years. There are also quite a few in the examples directory in SC. best, N On 2 Mar 2009, at 15:50, Dan Stowell wrote: Aha - that sounds like it has potential. So let's say for example that
we just wanted to store tags in a simple list of symbols, would
something like this do it?
SynthDef(\blah,
{ Out.ar(0, whatever) },
metadata: (tags: [\additive, \drum, \funky, \evil])
).store;
Dan
2009/3/2, James Harkins <jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx>:
The metadata dictionary might be interesting for tagging. We would
have to come up with a standard format - just pointing out, there's
already a structure in place to attach extra info to a SynthDef (and,
with .store, persist it on disk too).
hjh
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:08 AM, LFSaw <lfsaw@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey,
great idea!
one cosideration to make it more 2.0:
Tags
like they're used in delicious or, uhm, all other web2.0 sites.
It's a more open way of collecting information on the synths; we may
additionally add valid UGens as tags automatically…
#|
fredrikolofsson.com klippav.org musicalfieldsforever.com |#
|