Re: [sc-users] Creation of a SynthDef catalog

[Dan Stowell <danstowell@xxxxxxxxx>]

Aha - that sounds like it has potential. So let's say for example that
we just wanted to store tags in a simple list of symbols, would
something like this do it?

SynthDef(\blah,
    { Out.ar(0, whatever) },
    metadata: (tags: [\additive, \drum, \funky, \evil])
).store;

Dan

2009/3/2, James Harkins <jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx>:
> The metadata dictionary might be interesting for tagging. We would
>  have to come up with a standard format - just pointing out, there's
>  already a structure in place to attach extra info to a SynthDef (and,
>  with .store, persist it on disk too).
>  hjh
>
>
>  On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:08 AM, LFSaw <lfsaw@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  > Hey,
>  >
>  > great idea!
>  >
>  > one cosideration to make it more 2.0:
>  >        Tags
>  > like they're used in delicious or, uhm, all other web2.0 sites.
>  > It's a more open way of collecting information on the synths; we may
>  > additionally add valid UGens as tags automatically…
>
>
>
> --
>  James Harkins /// dewdrop world
>  jamshark70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  http://www.dewdrop-world.net
>
>  "Come said the Muse,
>  Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
>  Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  sc-users mailing list
>
>  info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
>  archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
>  search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
>


-- 
http://www.mcld.co.uk

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/