Re: [sc-users] Newb question - creating subclass for audio signals

[David Etlinger <etlinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the responses so far. James, I'm not seeing why using a dictionary
is better than just declaring ~filter1, ~filter2, etc.? Except for namespace
clutter. But really, my main goal is to be able to write simply:

signal.doTheFiltering()

Maybe not worth it/impossible to get that, but at least I'll learn from
trying (as I already have from this example). I thought about subclassing
the "In" Ugen, and sending all audio in from another synth? That's not too
intuitive though and probably won't work...?


James Harkins-2 wrote:
> 
> ~filters = (
> 		// see the Environment helpfile under "prototypes" for more about  
> 'self'
> 	filter1: { |self, input ... args|
> 		LPF.ar(input, *args)
> 	},
> 	filter2: { |self, input ... args|
> 		HPF.ar(input, *args)
> 	},
> ...
> );
> 
> SynthDef( "Filtering", {
>      var signal1, signal2;
> 
>      signal1 = PlayBuf.ar( 2, bufNum );
>      signal2 = PinkNoise.ar(1.0);
> 
>      signal1 = ~filters.filter1(signal1);
>      signal2 = ~filters.filter2(signal2);
> } );
> 
> hjh
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Newb-question---creating-subclass-for-audio-signals-tp21225372p21227440.html
Sent from the Supercollider - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/