Re: 64 bit and precision? - was Re: [sc-users] DiskIn loop trig ?

[blackrain <blackrain.sc@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/29/08, Scott Wilson <s.d.wilson.1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  On 29 Nov 2008, at 13:51, blackrain wrote:
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > Yes, it sells upgrades. ;-)
> > >
> > >
> >
> > and they do sound good too!!!!
> >
>
>  Well you need a real a/b comparison for that to be meaningful.
>

art! isnt it all about that? =)

> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > All I stated is how some SC UGens slip. Sorry they do.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > So it's your fault? ;-)
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ok, my turn to say...
> > hmm
> > huh?
> > lol
> >
>
>  You're the one who apologised. ;-)
>

lol touche.

> >
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Well, I don't think so. Many UGens already use doubles where that
> actually
> > > helps. If there are some you think could benefit from this, make a case.
> > >
> > >
> > > S.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I thought we both showcased a couple of them a few posts back in the
> > original thread.
> >
>
>  Well propose a patch.
>
>
>  S.
>

counting sample steps is always safer as I was saying my code does -
yet not always possible or the best way to go so maybe soon =)

cheers,

x

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/