Re: [sc-users] OK to change AdhocClass -> Prototype?

To: SuperCollider users mailing list <sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Subject: Re: [sc-users] OK to change AdhocClass -> Prototype?

From: James Harkins <jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:30:00 -0500

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; bh=8wJ57BaljqtSVicZ3Y9aUGhSw21F5ox5LwohRvn3j/w=; b=CPlEFzDaUMvPykdMhwtHsZxVSFdb7vXkT+kTbkRM5V6c8SNkrm+Sg4cKL2WvfoLH7g49v1w2MmqlscvFcho50uzr2GmuMmeqGJTbJDRpK1k51Z6z7lrvSHC1w6BkJB07NOMObUrCKuzZ9Gzs8cYRh3JpoIw/jICuRr1IWpoxPGg=

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; b=rD83wbP8nXvQWHC552kPaCtC6df26pUW9c3+yRB5ETA7+9ImT38TSlt9SZukkg7UamePHw5TNRUooMmavbBunYYZoUYbXnP6mBncTytE4fPZgDov9lONGdRRykFTSjEBrHlEorpWpNfsd4YfNEBGZ3jrAA6tJ1P8L8eSgLty0EI=

In-reply-to: <107BF259-F3EB-494E-AACD-90C34D4ADF1E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

List-archive: <http://www.create.ucsb.edu/pipermail/sc-users>

List-help: <mailto:sc-users-request@create.ucsb.edu?subject=help>

List-id: SuperCollider users mailing list <sc-users.create.ucsb.edu>

List-post: <mailto:sc-users@create.ucsb.edu>

List-subscribe: <http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users>, <mailto:sc-users-request@create.ucsb.edu?subject=subscribe>

List-unsubscribe: <http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users>, <mailto:sc-users-request@create.ucsb.edu?subject=unsubscribe>

References: <D690BCD6-95C2-40B7-9D37-CC13CC2EB2CA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p06230931c38b4bfaf2e6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <11294100712161345l66ff001fxfc171410af91d4ad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p06240801c38c0e811c20@[84.119.76.89]> <107BF259-F3EB-494E-AACD-90C34D4ADF1E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reply-to: SuperCollider users mailing list <sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This change is now committed, along with a couple of other small fixes. It seems okay with 3.1.1, with the single exception that the voicer note event prototype uses wrapAt and suffers from a bug in the primitive that didn't get fixed in time for 3.1.1. (That bug has since been fixed in svn.)

hjh

On Dec 17, 2007, at 7:24 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:

Proto has a kind of local, nickname feel (reminds me of Instr). So maybe that resolves the issue about using a general term that you mentioned, while still being more accurately descriptive?

S.

: H. James Harkins

: jamshark70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

: http://www.dewdrop-world.net

.::!:.:.......:.::........:..!.::.::...:..:...:.:.:.:..:

"Come said the Muse,

Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,

Sing me the universal." -- Whitman