Re: [sc-users] SeqColl windowing?

[Fredrik Olofsson <f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

or .slide with its arguments windowLength and stepSize?
a= [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
a.slide(3, 1).clump(3)
a.slide(3, 2).clump(3)

_f0

Am 24.10.2007 um 14:06 schrieb James Harkins:

> I would consider this:
>
> a = (1..9);
> ((0..6) +.t (0..2)).collect(a[_]);
>
> ((0, 2 .. 6) +.t (0..2)).collect(a[_]);
>
> See the Adverbs helpfile. Also I use the property of Array:at that  
> if you pass in an array of indices, you get an array with the  
> values at each corresponding index of the source array, e.g., a[[0,  
> 5]] == [1, 6]
>
> hjh
>
>
> On Oct 24, 2007, at 7:45 AM, Stefan Kersten wrote:
>
> > i'm looking for the nicest way to separate an array into  
> > overlapping subarrays, e.g. like this:
> >
> > [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
> > -> [[1, 2, 3], [2, 3, 4], [3, 4, 5], [4, 5, 6], [5, 6, 7], [6, 7,  
> > 8], [7, 8, 9]]
> > -> [[1, 2, 3], [3, 4, 5], [5, 6, 7], [7, 8, 9]]
> >
> > any suggestions?
> >
> > thx,
> > <sk>


  #|
     fredrikolofsson.com     klippav.org     musicalfieldsforever.com
  |#