Re: [sc-users] Announce: New FFT functionality

[nescivi <nescivi@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hiho,

On Thursday 18 October 2007 00:00:20 Dan Stowell wrote:
> But anyway, from my point of view PackFFT's main reason for existence
> is to follow on from UnpackFFT, so I didn't put too much effort into
> this aspect. If people start to get interested in creating hand-packed
> FFTs, then a UGen would be helpful...?

oh, and I forgot to say:
your example sounded so promising, so I think people will want to create 
hand-packed FFT's.

sincerely,
Marije