[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[sc-users] New MacBookPro and SC3

To: sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sc-users] New MacBookPro and SC3
From: Zip Boterbloem <zip@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:18:44 +0100
In-reply-to: <200612290034.kBT0YAio004026@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.create.ucsb.edu/pipermail/sc-users>
List-help: <mailto:sc-users-request@create.ucsb.edu?subject=help>
List-id: SuperCollider users mailing list <sc-users.create.ucsb.edu>
List-post: <mailto:sc-users@create.ucsb.edu>
List-subscribe: <http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users>, <mailto:sc-users-request@create.ucsb.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users>, <mailto:sc-users-request@create.ucsb.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200612290034.kBT0YAio004026@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: SuperCollider users mailing list <sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I just ran my SC3 torture patch on my new Intel MBP 2.33. Myworkhorse dual 1.8 GHz G5 can barely keep up with this patch and willbe on the verge of crapping out. The MBP barely hits 40% CPU...Remarkable.Even more so, as I found the difference between my old G5 1.5 GHzPowerBook and my G5 1.8 less than expected.

I'll do some more tests later today.

Best,

Zip

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [sc-users] New MacBookPro and SC3
  - From: Dan Stowell
- Re: [sc-users] New MacBookPro and SC3
  - From: Joshua Parmenter
- Re: [sc-users] New MacBookPro and SC3
  - From: Arie van Schutterhoef

Prev by Date: [sc-users] multiple Convolution2 UGens without CPU overload
Next by Date: Re: [sc-users] bit depth selection
Previous by thread: Re: [sc-users] multiple Convolution2 UGens without CPU overload
Next by thread: Re: [sc-users] New MacBookPro and SC3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread