[sc-users] buffer.read(numFrames) bug???

[kubick <ckubick@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'm noticing some strange behavior with Buffer.read
According to the activity monitor, when I load in
a large number of (1*44100) frame files, it takes up the same
the same amount of RAM as for the same files. but with (20*44100)  
frames.
The interesting thing is, the buffers only have 1 second of playable  
sound
with numFrames:(1*44100), as they should.  Anybody else had a similar  
experience?
Is there a problem?  Or is it me?
thanks,
chris kubick