Re: [sc-users] Graphics, Video and SC

[Till Bovermann <tboverma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think that a connection of scLang to all other programs should be  
the first shot...
especially because sclang is able to do exact timing, wh´hich is  
necesary for r/t multi-modal work...

I think, I'll have a look on VVVV for myself now ;-)

cheers
Till



On 03 Jan 2006, at 09:47, JostM wrote:

> Just looking through the web page for _Processing_  which Till,  
> Felix, and Larry mentioned, and they list a number of related  
> projects:
>
>
> Blender
> Context Free
> Design By Numbers
> DrawBot
> Eclipse
> Inkscape
> Isadora
> Jitter
> Myron & WebCamXtra
> PD
> Python
> Scriptographer
> VVVV
>
> several of these have OSC support of some kind.
> VVVV looks very interesting and easy to use. "Processing"  also  
> seems to be quite interesting, and it took me only minutes (using  
> one of the examples) to get it to communicate with the  
> supercollider server. The really big issues, it seems to me, is  
> that int the end, it becomes necessary to split things up between  
> several computers, and then things get rather complex . If I have  
> an  installation in SC, then somehow I have to tell my graphics  
> programs which busses to poll, etc.  If the intallation is  
> constantly dynamically allocating and freeing busses, is the  
> solution then to have all of the programs communicate with each  
> other over OSC. Does that work smoothly? Has any one here had  
> experience with this yet?
>
> If anyone has had experience with this yet, I think quite a few SC  
> users might be interested.
> I'm looking into this stuff more closely at the moment, and will  
> also report back soon, perhaps with a vew examples.
>
>
> jostM
> _______________________________________________
> sc-users mailing list
> sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users