Re: [sc-users] Or

[TomD <tomdiscus@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

But testing this "function" principle with "||" seems to work too...

a = 0;
if((a == 0) || {"2nd test".postln; 0.5.coin}) { "true".postln } 
{"false".postln };

So is there any difference between "or:" and "||" (as with "and:" and 
"&&") ?

T

Le 6 oct. 05, à 23:35, TomD a écrit :

> Le 29 sept. 05, à 16:53, James Harkins a écrit :
>
> > if((a == 1) or: { "2nd test".postln; 0.5.coin}) { "true".postln } {
> > "false".postln };
> >
> > (a == 0) is false, so we have to run the second test to get the 
> > result.
> >
> > The second test has to be written as a function for short-circuiting 
> > to work.
>
> I guess you mean "(a == 1) is false, so we have to run(...)"
>
> Ok nice to understand more practically "or:" and "and:", thanks a lot.
>
> It seems to work too, writing that same example that way, as with "&&" 
> and "||" (the way I do until now):
>
> if((a == 1) or: { "2nd test".postln; 0.5.coin}, { "true".postln }, 
> {"false".postln });
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-users mailing list
> sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users