Re: [sc-users] out of scope variables when passing functions was: Re: [sc-users] SystemClock-schedAbs explodes when time arg not used?

[Charlls Quarra <charlls_quarra@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

 was: Re: [sc-users] SystemClock-schedAbs explodes
when time arg not used?


  --- James Harkins <jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
 
 > A function is aware of variables in all enclosing
 > scopes, unless the 
 > function defines a variable or argument having the
 > same name as a 
 > variable in a higher-level scope.
 > 
 > arg item ,i, at=i;
 
 This is a one or two weeks old thread, but tinkering
with the SystemClock explode thread examples i could
manage to come up with an example that truly
reproduces the problem i was having (and is the true
reason of the other thread)

look this:

MyClassA {

*new { 
 ^super.new.init
}

init {
}

dump { | me |

(" great "++me).postln;
}

}

MyClassB {

var <>myA;

*new { 
^super.new.init
}

init {
myA = MyClassA.new;
}

play { 
var k;
k = 0;
5.do{arg i; 
  
SystemClock.schedAbs( thisThread.clock.seconds + i +
1.0 , {arg time; myA.dump( k ); nil } );
("but while i is "++i++" k is "++k).postln;
k = k + i;
}
}

}

then;

a = MyClassB.new;
a.play;

but while i is 0 k is 0
but while i is 1 k is 0
but while i is 2 k is 1
but while i is 3 k is 3
but while i is 4 k is 6
a MyClassB
 great 10
 great 10
 great 10
 great 10
 great 10

So i'm getting the value of k at the time of the
execution of the scheduled function. What i want is to
pass the value of k at the time of the _scheduling_,
that is what i want *views to the heavens with a
thanks gesture*


__________________________________________________
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! 
¡Abrí tu cuenta ya! - http://correo.yahoo.com.ar