On 5 Sep 2005, at 16:53, James Harkins wrote:
This is sort of what I meant when I said use the same syntax. Sorry, should have been clearer. But given that BinaryOpUGen already supports this is there a reason why this shouldn't simply be done in AbstractFunction? As I noted before it inherits Object's methods wherein equality equals identity, so there'd be no lost functionality. Don't know if this would break anything, but seems like it might be useful with Function composition anyway.On Sep 4, 2005, at 4:50 PM, Joshua Parmenter wrote:So the issue is merely that AbstractFunction doesn't implement == and != -- why could UGen not simply implement those two operators?
S.