Re: [sc-users] BooleanUGens (was Re: conditional statement in SynthDef)

[Scott Wilson <sdwilson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 5 Sep 2005, at 15:27, Joshua Parmenter wrote:

> Mine are more typing.

:-)
> I made the == and != ones because there seemed to be a need, and since 
> <, > <= and >= were an easy cut and paste away, I did them also.  
> Forgot about the one's that were already there.
Okay. I think there might be an argument for == and != ugens in the 
main lib (would be consistent) but I think they should use the same 
syntax. Since UGen just inherits these from Object (and thus equality 
is identity) no functionality would be lost. There might be some places 
that this would need to be changed though. Could be a pain...

S.