Re: [sc-users] Re: [Announce] sc.dot, and compiler path proposal

[Shigeru Kobayashi <kotobuki@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

The idea, 'Extensions' directory, sounds very good. I have been a 
little bit frustrated when updating SuperCollider with a new snapshots. 
I hope that this feature will be supported in the near future.

Thanks,

Shigeru


On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:16:20 -0800, James McCartney wrote:
> 
> On Dec 16, 2004, at 4:41 AM, Rohan Drape wrote:
> 
>>> Is there more better configuration to use sc.dot? Anyway, thank you
>>> very much for your great visualization tool.
>> 
>> No, that is quite exactly what is required!
>> 
>> With regards the last two steps:
>> 
>> I would like to make some changes to the SC compiler rules that would
>> allow entire extension packages to be dropped into an 'Extensions'
>> directory, perhaps '~/Documents/SuperCollider/Extensions'.
> 
> 
> I think :
> 
>  ~/Library/Application Support/SuperCollider/Extensions
> (for single user)
> 
> and
> 
> /Library/Application Support/SuperCollider/Extensions
> (for extensions for all users)
> 
> are more appropriate places on OS X.