Re: [sc-users] SC-third generation

[Arie van Schutterhoef <arsche@xxxxxxxxx>]

>On the whole I've found this to be true but I can't
>get past the scope examples, sadly.
-The change between SC2 and SC3 is for the most
 part in the the architecture.
 SC2 had all its components 'inside': language and
 execution;
 SC3 expanded this into these two entities:
 language and execution. Being respitively the
 sclang and the scserver communicating through
 a OSC dialect.
 On one machine SC3 may feel slightly indirect,
 where as SC2 feels more direct. However SC2
 made the best of the available machine resources
 at the time.
 SC3 is much more equiped to take advantage of
 the current network technology. Much more than
 other programs.

AvS

  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.....................................................................

  `    |Schreck Ensemble    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +

    `  |# -laboratory for live electro-acoustic music- #            |
       |             http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/                 |
       |             http://www.schreck.dds.nl/                     |
     ` *===========================================================++
     ` |Compositions http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/compo.html  |
     ` |Samples      http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/samp.html   |
     ` |Patches      http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/pat.html    |
     ` |Videos       http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/video.html  |

     ` |Scores       http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/scores.html |

       *===========================================================++
  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.....................................................................