Agreed. The point of the sentence is that it can go as high as two. The fact that it varies based on the freqs involved is not really the point.
The point of the original sentence was that the resultant peak amplitude is always twice the original peak amplitude. I'm not sure how you can misconstrue the meaning of the sentence as anything other than this, unless the meaning of the word "is" is ambiguous to you... :-)
That said, I do agree that the fact that it varies based on the playback and beat frequencies isn't the point -- seeing as there is no mention (or consideration) of that in the original sentence. :-)
_______________________________________________ sc-dev mailing list info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/ search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/