[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-dev] For a more tolerant PlayBuf



2013/12/12 Julian Rohrhuber <julian.rohrhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On 12.12.2013, at 21:21, Dan Stowell <danstowell+sc3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> 2013/12/12 Julian Rohrhuber <julian.rohrhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>> On 12.12.2013, at 19:48, Scott Wilson <i@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Would this be a good case for the rarely seen /cmd? We could turn this functionality and/or a warning on and off.
>>>
>>> Ah good idea - is there an example usage somewhere?
>>
>> Warning on by default please! There's some quite good stuff in the
>> right-hand channel of my stereo soundfiles ;)
>
> well what would you expect when you write:
> PlayBuf.ar(1, buf)
>
> Maybe you'd expect a mixdown?

Not really - in some systems that would be a great idea, but it's not
really SC style. Instead I'd expect SC to remind me that I'm
potentially making a mistake. Whether that's in the form of an error
(as now) or a warning I don't mind.

Dan

-- 
http://www.mcld.co.uk

_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/