[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Document status, was Re: [sc-dev] writeClientCSS



On 3 Dec 2013, at 23:06, Julian Rohrhuber <julian.rohrhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> On 03.12.2013, at 23:50, thor <th.list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> The reason I’m interested in the Document as part of a standalone is because TextView is, and has traditionally been, too limited (but maybe for no reason anymore, since Qt supports it all). Perhaps all the methods of the Document we’re used to could be implemented in a TextView.
>> 
>> But as Julian says, there might well be user cases where the IDE would be part of the standalone, although I can’t see that those would be many if we had a good TextView class. Julian, what did you have in mind?
> 
> It is useful for specific functionality to isolate one version of sc, be it for education or preservation of a piece…


Yes, but why do you need the IDE for that? Seems superfluous, as you could bundle the whole thing into one sclang which would include GUI elements, TextView, help browser, etc. (just create a wrapper around it with an .app file ending).



> _______________________________________________
> sc-dev mailing list
> 
> info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
> search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/


_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/