[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sc-dev] Re: Still occasional memory corruption...
- To: sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [sc-dev] Re: Still occasional memory corruption...
- From: James Harkins <jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:59:23 +0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TA5ymNNLk9HSs8IKFRlP5Pfjkj+c7jGbwYeboHDCCHU=; b=CD3xZ6GR5oedlrpsUlFBzbTRI2lM82IySaz6sY5p15QFZfccICCYv4rR73m5ar5Nga p+8PlRGvogwS23Za0+QNhMm+xAL3bkF7DYM63hGCYswyfzFc5Poz/oq4xq+RkQh528DK bHs7QE/apjvmp9+3MShPRkSPKci7nEyTM2Zg4PDSWiwECw27FgeIaWcSjOEP1nLI8pus 3Ifzu18I6C4BPLABL3jzjDwHfVM+72B91vdM+zpryVPbiI1CbW/s6XNVwKYjK/UaEgOe wgh7xBIN0/sdL9KRAHHfPbPLe01usorSXc9bzbO/TQJMFXO1J4yIOuQK7BZj7QRF7Q5A hIOw==
- In-reply-to: <CALfiFhBaPWOa3EjL2WvWf1kmOOqNCXC==MS_ecASVMDSxKm1kw@mail.gmail.com>
- List-id: SuperCollider developers mailing list <sc-devel.create.ucsb.edu>
- References: <e9c54435-cbb4-4d2c-91ed-0aebc1cae12b@dewdrop-world.net> <329a31ad-f6be-4878-bafa-497e25d73d30@dewdrop-world.net> <CALfiFhBaPWOa3EjL2WvWf1kmOOqNCXC==MS_ecASVMDSxKm1kw@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Nov 20, 2013 5:53 PM, "Jonatan Liljedahl" <lijon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Regarding SC4, I think this is another demonstration of why it would
> be good to use an existing language implementation instead. sclang has
> hard-to-find bugs, and no one understands all the internals.
I would have resisted that conclusion, but at this point... seriously... I'm ticked off enough to say, yeah, SC 4, let's chuck the whole thing and go with a virtual machine that has not had non-experts mucking about with it.
My last ditch effort is to bump up stack sizes to some absurd amount, in the hopes that all I'm seeing is stack overflow.
hjh