Re: [sc-dev] Towards SC 4

[Josh Parmenter <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Nov 12, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Jonatan Liljedahl <lijon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Perhaps it would make sense to create a new interpreter from scratch,
> only building upon the existing syntax and extend it with namespaces
> and modules etc, as well as cleaning away *some* of the syntactic
> sugar? What about LLVM as backend? JIT compilation into real
> super-fast machine code? That would be tasty :)

And this is the kind of thinking that I think we should be doing :)

******************************************
/* Joshua D. Parmenter
http://www.realizedsound.net/josh/

“Every composer – at all times and in all cases – gives his own interpretation of how modern society is structured: whether actively or passively, consciously or unconsciously, he makes choices in this regard. He may be conservative or he may subject himself to continual renewal; or he may strive for a revolutionary, historical or social palingenesis." - Luigi Nono
*/


_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/