Re: [sc-dev] Towards SC 4

[Scott Wilson <i@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12 Nov 2013, at 13:42, Bovermann Till <till.bovermann@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

(2) What about (officially) extending an existing state of the art programming language such as Ruby ( https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/ ) or _javascript_ with 
(a) guaranteed realtime waiting (as crucial for musical tasks) and
(b) synthdef generation?

I have the feeling that Ruby is pretty close to SClang, however it lacks both the rt features and the extensive music-oriented library of SC.

Be aware that those languages (or individual implementations of them) may or may not be realtime friendly.

S.