[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sc-dev] [supercollider/supercollider] bf8c91: class library: bitTest method minor speed improvem...
I'd probably just revert it in master and push as, that avoids an additional merge commit, but others may have a different opinion.
S.
On 1 Nov 2013, at 22:14, Fredrik Olofsson <f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ok, i managed to revert the commit with the GitHub application.
> and then i issued a new pull request... https://github.com/supercollider/supercollider/pull/989
>
> is this how you are supposed to do it?
> _f
>
> 1 nov 2013 kl. 22:42 skrev Fredrik Olofsson <f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> hm, i need help with this. how can i revert? is one of these answers an option? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12339568/github-remove-commit-from-a-merge
>> (sorry to be so helpless - not really sure what i'm doing when it comes to git)
>> _f
>>
>> 1 nov 2013 kl. 21:24 skrev Scott Wilson <i@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>> Oops! can you revert that please?
>>>
>>> On 1 Nov 2013, at 16:11, Fredrik Olofsson <f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> thanks Scott.
>>>>
>>>> but for the "Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'"... https://github.com/supercollider/supercollider/commit/3d1ca4fd93a773ab114e474790b32a6e1732eb97
>>>> i must have done something very wrong. don't think that should go into git master.
>>>>
>>>> _f
>
>
> #|
> fredrikolofsson.com musicalfieldsforever.com
> |#
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-dev mailing list
>
> info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
> search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/
_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list
info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/