[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sc-dev] Strange EnvGen gate behavior
- To: sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [sc-dev] Strange EnvGen gate behavior
- From: Julian Rohrhuber <julian.rohrhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 23:01:23 +0100
- In-reply-to: <50E6EA42.8080709@klingt.org>
- List-id: SuperCollider developers mailing list <sc-devel.create.ucsb.edu>
- References: <9AE8C8FB-8F9B-47DE-BEAC-EEEBF0B39715@k-hornz.de> <CAFniQ7V4e-=2b1uR1Yc-SP9bmVbbbSyw0oJE+q8bs-YByYuUSQ@mail.gmail.com> <79C1C37A-F83B-41CD-A0BA-F379A2BC2820@k-hornz.de> <CAFniQ7UU9_X97Wwtt1ij40W840aRXjqH8cbwZQx90g5bjJafTw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFniQ7XpKb3PFKW0x6uNMnrQS812S_fkv6LaTOz-o+oDDJf-LA@mail.gmail.com> <50CD983B.5010006@k-hornz.de> <50CD9B56.6060000@klingt.org> <50CDFE67.1010303@k-hornz.de> <50CE00DF.6070605@klingt.org> <ACF2423D-AD41-48B0-B243-A56DD8CD7D18@k-hornz.de> <50CF44D2.6090005@klingt.org> <489C3B94-31D9-4F96-8333-35EA2C04A9F5@musikundmedien.net> <CBB0271A-61D4-4F0B-AB77-FFAB13AC7043@k-hornz.de> <CALfiFhBknCiHanybd2pHJ2T9ym-Ca5bcEs_JeTZr381nmgO3_Q@mail.gmail.com> <50D0E791.8020005@k-hornz.de> <D8924030-957B-47DB-A7C1-E3DD0D980307@k-hornz.de> <50E6EA42.8080709@klingt.org>
- Reply-to: sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 04.01.2013, at 15:42, Tim Blechmann <tim@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hi stefan,
>
>>> ok, i've sent a pull request here [1]. julian, could you maybe pull from
>>> that branch and see how much work it would be to convert jitlib to the
>>> new semantics?
>> ...
>>> [1] https://github.com/supercollider/supercollider/pull/700
>>
>> could somebody please merge this pull request? unless there are any objections, of course.
>
> no objections, however it it will break jitlib, which should probably be
> fixed first ... julian?
hi all,
i've looked briefly at this - it will break jitlib when you use i-rate controls. I think that your change can be supported, but I certainly don't have the time to test it for the next two months.
I could however send you a patch which someone could check.
Are all variants of multichannel arguments and control maps supported as synth arguments?
e.g. ["/s_new", name, id, 1, 1, "freq", ["a_45", "a_46"], "rate", [3, 0.2, 2]]
Btw. If you need to contact me, it is better to mail me directly, as I'm not currently reading the list.
_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list
info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/