[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-dev] c++11 in sc

On 03/01/2013, at 14:03, Tim Blechmann <tim@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I guess the crucial question is whether it would make life hard for
>> any mac folks.
> i've asked the llvm people on irc, who mentioned that for 10.6 we might
> have to ship our own libc++, for >=10.7 they should be fine ... but
> there is always 3.6, which will run on older versions ... however
> building libc++ doesn't seem to be hard [1] ... in a way, i doubt that
> apple updates their toolchain for 10.6, as of course they have an
> interest that people buy their newest kitten ...
> otoh, it really simplifies a lot of code as we can throw away a lot of
> platform-specific code ...

personally i'd be interested in 10.6 compatibility, so if it works with a custom libc++ that would be great. i'm in favor of c++11 for a cleaner codebase.

btw, is there a good intro to the new standard?


sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/