[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries

To: sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries
From: James Harkins <jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:35:28 +0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1kTjFThZx+ruSq1oY1Wjcwa3wAKOWBx+tQE/Kapdwb8=; b=AR9unU9rLtrWPKDZRocBsTKPNHStXyWDIbfEtzWhWelQ3vP+agh03kx2dF1MEk5kWO m6UZqfYtKrCWzEGrBIS0fFqK6aFa7RN0ecgqm9+L75+2t6Rp0/m4oqUKwIlgXZyq5tI3 NFkIx2X8pz2dt3+4BUIt2+iQMycSM4irtYilLBf9SEUn7027ZxepMWoJmFF+lSoMSc6R mQrqpUL1E9XEN/BxOM12+EOB5lNxm0cl4abHC34XyFR0D0OhyX/C69hs+QOH/KzA73j0 ccWnu6ga1OH0z8TAkkYf5JimixhgIFrHWJZPOpz3/sBWHZytVRhVvIBLi5LEOvR4YgdT kofw==
In-reply-to: <CAFu0fFeNqDFOes+vdC=Ls+Oc1DUuuMHQBECTX4shDVtDdz-7Gw@mail.gmail.com>
List-id: SuperCollider developers mailing list <sc-devel.create.ucsb.edu>
References: <1356168155-11382-1-git-send-email-danstowell+sc3@gmail.com> <CAAuBga1hVvihgrxnAKHbi_92oQ1Mmxt-pA18Ke3dQATN3ysXig@mail.gmail.com> <CANuikkoEYNw6f7m4GSwOrM1zWJdgH16amhJx7HDDsjRR0UPsSg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAuBga16rj=7G1EW+3X1cD9KLd4mSCoM5jGuznseK67vOOBXuA@mail.gmail.com> <CANuikkqmNdEQGwwEbfsZPvZvUxxZ_K0efHqO+1J-v=7SrxJjDQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAuBga0NJLcGyEM1-h_AsOFBSss0M4_urm5NZmOwT=qFbM5xcg@mail.gmail.com> <CANuikkq25ysAm+5+V25Z2-LH08BnJ2NxpF416_pB-9UxY3B5zQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAuBga3_=cErOJt_s3wrn5eTqx_zO3t3AROdZ=WZeYsaxwZV7w@mail.gmail.com> <CANuikkrPkV2vythBo7vXfmm-D_en4M1+xcbxKe+wz_+ZzKJR=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAFu0fFeNqDFOes+vdC=Ls+Oc1DUuuMHQBECTX4shDVtDdz-7Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Dec 28, 2012 9:39 AM, "Lucas Samaruga" <samarugalucas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Is it important for the Quarks to be in a compatible license? (sorry, I don't really understand the full issue).

I expect not. Quarks are not bundled in packages distributed by Linux package managers, so Linux distros' licensing requirements for packages would not apply -- whereas SC binaries *are* distributed that way.

hjh

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries
  - From: Dan Stowell

References:
- [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries
  - From: danstowell+sc3
- Re: [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries
  - From: Jakob Leben
- Re: [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries
  - From: Dan Stowell
- Re: [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries
  - From: Jakob Leben
- Re: [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries
  - From: Dan Stowell
- Re: [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries
  - From: Jakob Leben
- Re: [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries
  - From: Dan Stowell
- Re: [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries
  - From: Jakob Leben
- Re: [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries
  - From: Dan Stowell
- Re: [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries
  - From: Lucas Samaruga

Prev by Date: Re: [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries
Next by Date: Re: [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries
Previous by thread: Re: [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries
Next by thread: Re: [sc-dev] [PATCH] Add cmake option NO_GPL3 to simplify building of GPL2 binaries
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread